Are China's scientists using stolen technology from the United States to develop their own high-tech surveillance and weapons systems?
There is a link between the Red Chinese forcing down a U.S. electronic warfare techniques being developed in conjunction with mysterious chemtrails crisscrossing America's skies daily.
The downed plane and chemtrails information, together, could significantly enhance China's military capability.
The June 11 SPOTLIGHT revealed that the military is developing techniques to wage war by depositing in the American skies chemicals identified as chemtrails left by high-flying jet aircraft.
These new war-fighting techniques include three-dimensional radar that can scan enemy territory from hundreds of miles away; a means of altering worldwide weather patterns; and a means of detecting and decontaminating biological and chemical weapons in the air.
Obviously, other countries are eager to get the secrets evolving from the chemtrails experiments.
As readers now realize, these experiments are being concealed from the American people, who are experiencing health problems from the release of the chemicals, including mixtures of toxic barium salts.
The Pentagon has said little about the type of electronics aboard the aircraft forced to land on Hainan Island except that it was observing military buildups on China's mainland.
With the new three-dimensional radar techniques being developed through use of chemtrails, s well as the means to wage war with the weather, which could destroy crops and cause severe food shortages for China's vast population, China's leaders are intensely interested in America's research.
The communists fear that those weapons, already being tested in America, may one day be directed at Red China.
Just how much of the ultra-secret technology the Chinese have culled from the plane is unknown outside military circles, but those secrets were certainly compromised to some degree.
Are Chinese scientist, through technology already stolen from America's laboratories throughout the years of President Clinton and now from the spy plane, developing their own super seek-and-scan radar - even, perhaps, weather weapons?*
The McCain-Lieberman legislation would virtually abolish gun shows in America, an expert who analyzed the proposal has concluded.
The "Gun Show
Loophole Closing and Gun Law Enforcement Act" (S. 890) is
jointly sponsored by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Joe Lieberman
(D-Conn.). It was analyzed by Michael P. Anthony, a lawyer specializing
in gun legislation,
for Alan Korwin, author of Gun Laws of
America.
Such legislation could "easily" shut down gun shows, Anthony found.
"If a gun show operator allows even a single unlicensed gun vendor to attend the show, the feds can lock up the operator," Anthony said. "They have a ton of extra money in this bill for enforcement of such things."
Of any person attending a show offers - not sells, but offers - a gun to anyone else, even if the gun is not with him, he becomes a "vendor" and everyone is subject to arrest and imprisonment: the seller, the buyer and the show operator, he said.
The only way an operator could safely run a show would be to pre-register every one as a vendor, not just an attendee, Anthony said. This means a personal identification and, centralized registration.
The legislation "is advertised as a way to prevent a criminal from avoiding a background check" but is actually "a sneak attack on the very existence of gun shows as we know them," Anthony said.
Anthony shows how doublespeak is used to deceive the public.
The gun show operator must give a 30-day notice directly to the secretary of the treasury of "the vendors planning to participate," one section reads. This is not limited, as in the next paragraph of the legislation, where 72-hour notice applies only to "special firearms event vendors planning to participate." (Gun dealers are called "special firearms event vendors" in the bill.)
So is it 30 days or 72 hours?
"Subtle and deceptive distinctions like this are quite common in law and frequently used to slip in controversial conditions," Anthony explained. "When found, bill sponsors sometimes claim clerical error. When undetected, they pass into law and are enforced as they read."
Everyone attending a show must be registered, he said. If an operator is unable to prove that "each person who attends" the gun show has been notified of every requirement in the 3,900-word bull, in accordance with "regulations" the legislation authorizes that are yet to be written, he can be jailed for five years and lose his license.
"The legal challenges this forces on gun show operators are obvious," Anthony said. "Imagine this:
"The feds say you failed to go notify Joe (a plant) who went to your show. They have photos of Joe inside and they seek to close your show and arrest you - using the millions of new dollars conveniently allocated for additional enforcement. How do you prove they are wrong?
GLOBAL GUN GRAB
Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.) warns that the United Nations may ultimately override the U.S. Constitution and take your gun away.
"When I hear about the United Nations getting involved with anything to do with firearms, I worry about it because I think their agenda is an anti-gun agenda. It is anti-private ownership of guns," he wrote in the journal America's First Freedom.
"The UN is right now engaged in a very deliberate, long-term and serious effort to completely undermine the freedoms we have in America for private gun ownership,' Barr said. "Make no mistake about it: that is their agenda."
The UN is "exerting tremendous pressure on member nations to become involved in this, and, if our citizens don't wake up to this, we could be in a lot of trouble,' Barr said.
"If people don't know, then we could wake up one day in the not-too-distant future and find our constitutional rights are meaningless because of a treaty that has been interposed and overlaid on our domestic rights," Barr said.*
Profits are feeding the epidemic of diabetes while the Establishment hides the fact that the disease is reversible.
Syndrome X - adult-onset, type II diabetes - has reached epidemic proportions in the United States.
However, no steps are being taken by the government or allopathic doctors to try to prevent the spread of diabetes because it is a major moneymaker for the Establishment medical community.
Americans are efficient but gullible. To presume that hte diabetes industry would sacrifice billions of dollars a year by quickly ending the diabetes epidemic is unrealistic.
Diabetes, Syndrome X, exhibits many severe symptoms, including elevated blood sugar, elevated insulin levels, high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol and triglycerides, heart failure, stroke, kidney failure, impotence and hypothyroidism.
However, diabetes is only treated by doctors, who expect to be paid for not curing disease, for often making the disease worse and, even, for sometines killing the patient.
The drug companies find a financial bonanza in treating symptoms without curing degenerative disease.
There are myriad drugs to treat all of the symptoms, but where is the financial incentive to sell a drug that quickly cures the underlying disease?
Diabetes magazines and newsletters focus on a vast array of drugs and devices designed to help the diabetic cope. They are typically supported by advertisers of drugs, blood testers, pancreatic pumps, test strips, fungal treatments, insulin, fake sweeteners, questionable food products, insulin pumps, blood pressure monitors and an impressive array of other diabetes-related products. None of them cure diabetes. Some make the disease worse.
Advertising revenue supports these magazines. To protect this advertising revenue, these magazines assure that their subscribers are never confronted with the truth that diabetes is curable.
One popular diabetes magazine, in a recent issue, had an ad for a sugar-regulating drug called Glucophage.
The ad contains the admonishment "along with diet and exercise, Glucophage can help you lower your blood sugar..."
An example of the sort of diet the magazine recommended was stir fry.
Stir-fried foods along with deep fried foods are among the most diabetes-provoking in the American food chain. Both are saturated with over-heated oils.
These destroyed oils have been implicated as a causative agent in type II diabetes for decades. To recommend this to the diabetic is to insure that his diabetes will never go into remission.
Food is to blame for this epidemic.
Today's food has been engineered for maximum shelf life without expensive refrigeration. Profits drive the companies that comprise the food chain. The terrible health consequences of this policy are never allowed to interfere with business.
The chemical processes involved with digestion and metabolism are the same processes , so necessary to digestion, are incompatible with the shelf-life requirements of the modern food industry.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is good for the diabetes business. To expect it to protect the public from bad food and drugs is a fantasy.
In an unusually candid comment, Dr. Herbert Ley, former FDA commissioner, said: "The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day."
Scientists are no more honest than any other segment of society. Frequently, with more to lose such as grants, tenure, corporate position, reputation, retirement and other financial rewards, they lie about their science through omission and commission.
Tax-free foundation, after trying for decades, are no closer to finding a cure than they were in the 1950s.
In the late 1950s, many reputable scientists began making the trans-fat connection to both cancer and diabetes. As late as the 1990s the American Heart Association was trumpeting deadly margarine as "heart healthy."
Another tax-free foundation was promoting worthless exchange diets and ridiculing the immense value of the glycemic index.*
Thomas Smith is a reluctant medical investigator having been forced into discovering a cure for his own diabetes because it was obvious that his doctor didn't have one. He has published the resultsof his investigations in a report entitled "Insulin: Our Silent Killer." He has posted these results on the web page www.Healingmatters.com. He can be reached at his toll-free number 1-866-320-7700.
Scientist have announced that they really don't know how many people are infected with a potentially fatal brain disease caught from bad beef.
America has a ban on British beef because of an animal brain disease that can be transmitted to humans. But no one knows when it started, how many people could be infected or what to do about it.
We're not talking about foot-and-mouth, the animal ailment that precipated the slaughter of Thousands of cattle and sheep in the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere in Europe over the past several months.
Foot-and-mouth disease is harmless to humans and runs its course in a matter of weeks.
What has scientists worried is a brain infection called BSE/CJD, which can be caught from infected cattle and can incubate - with no symptoms - over years.
The death toll for this human form of mad cow disease has reached 100 in the UK and shows no signs of slowing down, scientists said May 24.
The disturbing figure was revealed as British government advisers warned that elderly patients with variant CJD (vCJD) - the disease linked to eating BSE - infected beef - could be dying undiagnosed and that the true scaled of the epidemic could be far worse.
DON'T KNOW
One of the UK's leading epidemiologists warned that the most optimistic predictions of the spread of vCJD could now be ruled out.
In the first five months of the year there were 16 confirmed or suspected new cases of vCJD. If new cases continue to emerge at the same rate, the 2001 toll will top last year's total of 28 cases in the UK alone.
How many fatal cases elsewhere, which may have been misdiagnosed, is unknown. It could be none. But scientists don't know because they don't know when it started or how many - if any - cattle were exported before the disease was detected.
Prof. Peter Smith, chairman of the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC), which advises the UK government on BSE, CJD, and the related sheep disease scrapie, said:
"It is an arbitrary landmark, but obviously every additional case is of great concern. But it has reached 100 and some of the earlier predictions were that it would not reach 100. We don't know how it's going to evolve."
An early computer model of the disease by Prof. Roy Anderson, another member of SEAC and an epidemiologist at Imperial College, London, predicted a range of deaths between 100 and 100,000. Anderson warned that the epidemic was still rising.
"It will be a long time before we have an idea of the scale of this epidemic so that the bottom line remains that the future is still uncertain," Anderson said.
Although most patients with vCJD are in their 20s and 30s, a 74-year-old UK patient died of the disease last year.
SEAC called for more post mortem examinations to be conducted on elderly people who die with suspected dementia, in case vCJD is being misdiagnosed as Alzeimer's or senility.*
Don't believe the hype: Real milk is really good for you.
Over the past 40 years skim milk, low fat milk, 2 percent and no-fat milk products have been hailed as "healthier" than whole milk.
However, according to many diet experts, it's a lie. Taking the fat out of milk and homogenizing it was a huge nutritional mistake.
According to textbooks, the "approximate composition of milk" is water, 87.1 percent; Lactose, (sugar) 4.6 percent; fat, 4 percent; protein, 3.25 percent.
Thus, when the fat content is removed, the water, protein and sugar concentrations make up for the difference. Admittedly it is not a huge increase in sugar, but it is a serious change, converting a whole, complex natural food into a high-glycemic-index naked-sugar drink that is virtually as anti-nutritious as soda pop.
Look at it this way: a teaspoon of sugar in a cupof water would amount to a drink of less than 5 percent naked sugar.
After skimming away the fat and homogenizing the rest what do you have in a cup of milk? You have sugar mixed into other potentially harmful molecules created by the homogenization process.
Chen you consider the amounts of low-fat milk consumed by children, especially in schools where "fatophobic" dietitians design the meals, over time this added sugar can be as significantly harmful to them as the sugar of soda pop.
Taking the natural fat out of our foods has done a great deal of harm to our national diet. Without fat our bodies cannot utilize other components of food such as vitamins, protein and minerals. Nevertheless our society has been carefully indoctrinated to avoid fat as though it ware a poison.
Milk is one of the major staples of our national diet. But, what kind of milk is this? What is this stuff we are now getting from the cost-cutting, factory-farming? Government-monopoly-regulated dairy industry?
That's a pertinent observation and one that our society should consider carefully. We should reconsider our basic food supply problems.
Health advocates have been complaining about sugar overload in our supermarket culture for decades, and this article marks the first time any extra (naked) sugar from such a widespread source as milk has been considered.
Science has appeared reluctant to focus research on "naked sugar" during the recent anti-fat decades. Now some solid indications have shown up in the peer-reviewed literature to indicate that "sugar-containing drinks might increase adiposity in children."
That line was the headline across a page in the Feb. 17 issue of Lancet reviewers said:
"In Today's Lancet David Ludwig and colleagues provide new and convincing evidence about the relation between sugar intake and development of adiposity in children. They show that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is an independent risk factor for obesity in children aged 11-12 year..."
Further, in the January 2000 Journal of Nutrition, Australian scientists reported on an animal study that suggested the naked sugars in children's diets may lead to the epidemic of type II diabetes we are experiencing today.
The study found that high glycemic index carbohydrates or simple sugars found abundantly in the modern diet (which includes lactose from milk) led to obesity in the test animals.
Dr. Jenny Brand-Miller, co-author of the study, suspects that the simple sugars produced the over-secretion of insulin that led directly to the production of extra fat - about 15 percent more in the area of the animal[‘s body that corresponds with abdominal fat in humans.
The authors said their results point to childhood diets making the body more vulnerable to Type II Diabetes.
Parents who insist their young children use only low-fat or skim milk are not doing the your bodies any favors, despite propaganda to the contrary.
In fact, we the people would do well to return to a sampler time before the dairy industry become a major, capital intensive business.
The Campaign for Real Milk is lobbying fur such a sensible, cost-effective approach and it is time more Americans got on the "real milk" bandwagon.
Here are some excerpts from Campaign's literature:
"Real mill comes from real cows. The source of most commercial milk today is the modern Holstein, bred to produce huge quantities of milk - three times as much as the old-fashioned cow. She is a genetically-manipulated pituitary freak, needing special feed and antibiotics to keep her well. Her milk contains high levels of growth hormone from her pituitary gland, even when she is spared the indignities of rBGH to push her to the "udder" limits of milk production.
"Real Milk comes from real cows that eat real feed. Real feed for cows is green grass in Spring, Summer and Fall; silage, hay and root vegetables in Winter. It is not soy meal, cottonseed meal or other commercial feeds. Vital nutrients like vitamins A and D, and the "Price factor" - a fat soluble catalyst that encourages optimal assimilation of vitamins and mineral - are greatest in milk from cows eating green grass especially rapidly growing green grass. Vitamin A and D are greatly diminished, and the Price Factor disappears, when milk cows are fed soy or cottonseed meal. Soy meal has the wrong protein profile for dairy cows resulting in a shortened life span and making her milk less well tolerated by allergic individuals.
"Real milk is not pasteurized. Pasteurization destroys enzymes, diminishes vitamin content, denatures fragile milk proteins, alters vitamin B-12, destroys vitamin B-6, kill beneficial bacteria promotes pathogens and is associated with allergies, increased tooth decay, colic in infants, growth problems in children, osteoporosis, arthritis, heart disease and cancer. Raw milk sours naturally, but pasteurized milk turns putrid and processors must remove slime and pus from pasteurized milk by a process of centrifugal clarification.
"Inspection of dairy herds for disease is not required for pasteurized milk. The practice of heating milk to kill germs was instituted in the 1920s to combat tuberculosis, infant diarrhea and other diseases caused by dirty production methods. But times have hanged and modern stainless steel tanks, milking machines, refrigerated trucks and inspection methods make pasteurization absolutely unnecessary for public protection.
"Clean raw milk from certified healthy cows can be legally produced for commerce in only two states - California and Georgia. By executive order, former President Ronald Reagan forbade the transport of raw milk across state lines.
If you wonder why the great "conservative" Reagan would bother to issue such an executive order, remember this: He had been governor of California and the bureaucrats of that state have been lobbying and cajoling to eliminate the legal and successful raw milk dairies in that state for decades.
It appears that raw milk may finally be on the way out in the Golden State as the bureaucrats keep wearing down the state's only large producers - Steuve Brothers Dairy - with harassing "salmonella" raids where salmonella does not exist. The mere accusation of contamination brings everything to a costly halt requiring lawyers and loss of sales.
Real milk is not homogenized. Homogenization is a process that breaks down butterfat globules so they do not rise to the top. Homogenized milk has been linked to heart disease.
In 1983, Dr. Kurt A. Oster and Dr. Donald J. Ross wrote a book titled "The XO Factor." Dr. Oster demonstrated that homogenization allowed for the entry of xanthine oxidase into the bloodstream by absorption and this is a cause of artery lesions and heart disease.
According to Oster and Ross:
"Real milk contains butterfat, and lots of it. Average butterfat content at the turn of the century, when American dairy farmers used Jersey and Guernsey cows, was about 4 percent (or 51 percent of calories). Today butterfat comprises slightly over 3 percent (38 percent of calories). Worse, the consumer has been duped into believing that low-fat and skim milk products are good for him. Only by passing low-fat and skim milk off as a health food can the modern dairy industry get rid of its excess, poor quality, low-fat milk from olstein herds. Butterfat contains vitamins A and D needed for the assimilation of calcium and protein in the water fraction of the milk. Without them protein and calcium are more difficult to utilize and become possibly toxic. Butterfat is rich in short and medium chain fatty acids that protect against disease and stimulate the immune system. It contains glycospingolipids that prevent intestinal distress, and conjugated linoleic acid that has strong anti-cancer properties. Calves fed skim milk develop testicular strophy with complete sterility, and fail to grow."
And that's not all - good quality raw milk will contain plenty of good quality lactoferrin, the protein in milk that has now become an important dietary supplement. What a great money-making idea - take the good stuff out of natural foods and sell it in pill form to deficient, sickly people.
Oster and Ross continue:
"Real milk products contain no additives. Powdered skim milk, a source of dangerous oxidized cholesterol and neurotoxic proteins, is added to 1 percent and 2 percent milk. Some producers are now adding vegetable oils to skim milk. Low-fat yogurts and sour creams contain mucopolysaccharide slime to give them body. Pale butter from hay-fed cows contains colorings to make it look like vitamin-rich butter from grass fed cows. Bioengineered enzymes are used in large-scale cheese operations. Many mass-produced cheeses contain additives and imitation cheese products made from vegetable oils are passed off as the real thing.
The yellow-orange color of supermarket and fast food cheeses comes from annato, a tropical plant seed.
Most people believe bright dark yellow is the "natural" color of cheese - it is not. Any natural yellowing of butter and cheese is from the carotenoids contained in green grass eaten by pastured animals.*
The campaign for real milk makes sense economically and nutritionally. Information about the campaign may be obtained on the internet at www.realmilk.com or by contacting Campaign for Real Milk, P.O. Box 535, Peterborough NH 03458.